![]() In both of these interpretations you should be able to use the more powerful Versatile attack and your unarmed attacks as well. There's basically two interpretations you can go with this, but they both end up reaching the same conclusion. That said, it doesn't make thematic or mathematical sense to avoid monk weapons. Together, this all means that you can take the Attack action with an unarmed strike or any monk weapon, and follow that attack with one additional unarmed strike, without regard for any other factor.Īs for the use of Flurry of Blows with a non-monk weapon: nothing in the text establishes the use of a monk weapon as a requirement for the use of Flurry of Blows. No other restriction is given except that you need to take that Attack action with a monk weapon or unarmed strike. Here we see that you can make an unarmed strike as a bonus action after taking an Attack action. For example, if you take the Attack action and attack with a quarterstaff, you can also make an unarmed strike as a bonus action, assuming you haven't already taken a bonus action this turn. When you use the Attack action with an unarmed strike or a monk weapon on your turn, you can make one unarmed strike as a bonus action. details monk-specific differences that overrule the more general rules on page 195. Also, all characters are proficient with unarmed strikes. It's clear that unarmed strikes can come from multiple parts of the body. You are proficient with your unarmed strikes. On a hit, an unarmed strike deals bludgeoning damage equal to 1 + your Strength modifier. Instead of using a weapon to make a melee weapon attack, you can use an unarmed strike: a punch, kick, head-butt, or similar forceful blow (none of which count as weapons). The rules for unarmed strikes, by all characters, are on page 195: Would that also mean that if a monk is wielding a quarterstaff with two hands, he could open with an attack of damage, followed by an unarmed strike of damage with a bonus action (using Martials Arts) ?įirst, nothing says you need to have a hand free, so we can stop worrying about that. Am I missing any implied restrictions here? Or is a Monk somehow able to hold a two-handed weapon and still make use of Flurry of Blows ? If that is the case, I am to believe the unarmed strike from FoB would not be considered as weapons. ![]() If one is using a Versatile weapon, can he attack using both hands, making the damage 1d8 and still make use of his additional unarmed strike(s)?Īdditional remark: The extra unarmed strike granted by Flurry of Blows has no restrictions regarding the weapon(s) held. However, there are some gray areas I can't find any answers to.įor example, the Monk class allows a player to add an additional unarmed strike to his Attack action, as a bonus action. What are the global restrictions of making an unarmed strike? As it is considered a weapon, I suppose one must have a "hand free" to "punch". ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |